Thoroughbred Daily News


Click here to download Today's Edition  [4.93Mb - PDF]
Monday, May 20, 2013
Click HERE to view today's edition in your browser [4.93Mb - PDF]
Click HERE to save today's edition to your computer  [4.93Mb - PDF]
Yesterday's Edition
TDN Archive
TDN Home Page


Week in Photos
The TDN Collection
The TDN Blog
TDN Forum
Latest 3 Posts:
  • James Robison:
    I don't think racing ever had much "appeal" except as a fantasy of getting rich quick for ... (more)
  • James Robison:
    Well it was Orb's Preakness to lose and he did in a total dud of something you can't ev... (more)
  • Kristof M Singh:
    Most of these Video Journalists are not very knowledgeable about horses..How many have cl... (more)

TDN Sire Stats
TDN Sire Lists
APEX
TDN Progeny
   PP Counts
TDN Progeny PPs
TDN Sales PPs
TDN Insta-Tistics
TDN Stakes Winning
   Pedigrees
TCI on TDN
TDN Black Type
   Library
TDN Rising Stars
TDN op/ed
TDN Q&A
'The Last Word'
PEB's TDN Sketch
   of the Week
TDN Industry
   Calendar
Update PreferencesLogin Required
Columnists Archive
Bill Oppenheim
Sales Ticker
APEX Up Close
Andrew Caulfield
TDN Photo Gallery
TDN Youtube
   Channel
TDN Best Bets
TDN Magazine
TDN Foaling News
Links to Other Sites
Advertisers
Racetracks
TDN Race Criteria
Stakes Digest Weekly
F.A.Q. (Help!)
About the TDN
Contact Us
Advertising Info
Careers

You must be logged in view race videos and to submit comments to the TDN Forum. Click here to enter your user ID and password.

For the best site experience, the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader is suggested. Click here to get it free.

TDN Magazine

CoverPage.gif

Do We Need A Sturdier Racehorse?

In 1970, the year Secretariat was born, the average number of starts per runner per year was a healthy 10.22. Forego, born that same year, ran 57 times, including 18 starts in 1973. But even those numbers, remarkable by today’s standards, don’t put the mighty Forego in the same league with some of the true iron horses in the sport’s history. Hall of Famer Stymie started 131 times. In 2009, the average number of starts per horse was down to 6.23, a 39-percent decline over the 1970 numbers. The TDN takes a comprehensive look at why.

Congratulations to Bill Finley, winner of the 2010 Eclipse Award for excellence in news/enterprise writing for his piece, "Do We Need a Sturdier Racehorse?" published by the Thoroughbred Daily News as its November, 2010 magazine offering.


Comments (14)

Robert Losey - 03/14/2011 7:51:27 PM EST

While I suspect that Dr. Bramlage is correct that starting as a 2 yo has a positive effect on a horse's well-being, the verdict is out until a controlled study is done on this. It's possible that the horses that started at two were sounder to begin with, thus natuarally tended to hold up better through time.

Reply To This

Eugene Levey - 12/21/2010 3:13:41 PM EST

Replying to Daniel Perlsweig:
I agree horses used to run more times when I started training in 1954. --Dandy Dan.

HELLO STEVE.REMEMBER "LADY PIT"..47 10 14 5 $413,382

WON THE MOTHER GOOSE,CCA OAKS,DELAWARE OAKS, ALABAMA

JUST TO MENTION A FEW

Reply To This

Eugene Levey - 11/22/2010 12:29:37 PM EST

#1 Close the book at 40.

#2 You wouldn't believe me any way.

Reply To This

Sam Ferguson - 11/19/2010 12:49:05 PM EST

Replying to Richard Santulli:
Shouldn't we consider that two of the greatest sources of racing success trace back to Danzig and Mr.Prospector--clearly two unsound horses. In addition,the hottest sire of the last 15 years was Storm Cat--and the excuse when evaluating a yearling with offset knees was, "He's a Storm Cat." When we breed to unsoundness, is it a surprise we get unsoundness?

No problem in today's world; we'll get the good (and ethical?) vet to straighten those legs right out...then sell him of course.

Reply To This

Richard Santulli - 11/18/2010 10:53:08 AM EST

Shouldn't we consider that two of the greatest sources of racing success trace back to Danzig and Mr.Prospector--clearly two unsound horses. In addition,the hottest sire of the last 15 years was Storm Cat--and the excuse when evaluating a yearling with offset knees was, "He's a Storm Cat." When we breed to unsoundness, is it a surprise we get unsoundness?

Reply To This

Ben Walden, Jr. - 11/17/2010 8:18:20 AM EST

Our great stables of old bred to race, and for two turns. Today we breed for speed and for the sale ring. We then ask ill-equipped sprinters to run long because that is all our breed has to offer those distances. Sale prep crushes young horses...incredible volumes of feed in short spans and standing in a stall most all of their days at the farm. The great stables and their masters barely frequented a horse sale. Today ours live there and breed for there. This is what's happened to our American racehorse.

Reply To This

Sam Ferguson - 11/17/2010 7:34:40 AM EST

A well-done article that raises a lot of questions of which we all think we have the answers. My simple suggestion would be do what's right for the horse. Would you allow your child to be medicated/joint injected like your horse? Complete transparency would answer a lot of medical questions and help the spectator and bettor embrace the game.

There is another possible factor to horses not starting as 2 yr olds; they simply aren't sound enough.

Reply To This

James Robison - 11/16/2010 8:33:01 PM EST

Replying to Tom V. David, DVM:
There appear to be three major issues that need to be considered when evaluating the current problems facing the racing industry. Breeding, track surfaces and medication are on everyone’s agenda of issues that must be addressed if our sport is to survive, much less prosper. We can no longer sit idly by and assume that public perception is not reality. Breeding for the auction market rather than for soundness, buying for speed rather than longevity and medicating up to race time to alleviate problems brought on by this rationale has our industry on a downward spiral that must be reversed. Was it the breeder of the unsound horse or the veterinarian who tried to keep the horse racing sound with the use of medication? I can’t answer the chicken or the egg question but I do feel that the first and easiest solution is to address the medication. Changes in breeding and research on the optimum track surface will take years to accomplish the desired end result. Medication can be changed overnight. Horses are racing today on more medication than any time in the past and are having shorter careers, higher vet bills and more dissatisfied owners. Illegal drugs are not the problem--it’s the so called legal therapeutic medications that are over used and abused. Our allowable levels of therapeutic medications on race day make it extremely difficult to determine the health and soundness of the animal when a pre-race exam is conducted. Inflamed joints, muscles and mild lameness are masked by medication and therefore undetectable to the examining veterinarian. These problems may be minor until the horse leaves the starting gate but become major by the time they reach the turn for home and down the stretch, putting both horse and rider at risk. We keep many horses racing under the influence of medication that should be retired prior to their career- ending injuries. How can the breeder judge the potential of a sire or dam when performance was influenced with medication? How does track surface research factor in medication? Having raced with so called therapeutic medication for some thirty years, I now believe we have developed a culture and a breed that is medication dependent.

We are a breed ourselves that is medication dependent. From time immemorial performance has been fueled. The higher the level of performance, the higher the fuel.

Reply To This

Tom V. David, DVM - 11/16/2010 5:29:07 PM EST

There appear to be three major issues that need to be considered when evaluating the current problems facing the racing industry. Breeding, track surfaces and medication are on everyone’s agenda of issues that must be addressed if our sport is to survive, much less prosper. We can no longer sit idly by and assume that public perception is not reality. Breeding for the auction market rather than for soundness, buying for speed rather than longevity and medicating up to race time to alleviate problems brought on by this rationale has our industry on a downward spiral that must be reversed. Was it the breeder of the unsound horse or the veterinarian who tried to keep the horse racing sound with the use of medication? I can’t answer the chicken or the egg question but I do feel that the first and easiest solution is to address the medication.

Changes in breeding and research on the optimum track surface will take years to accomplish the desired end result. Medication can be changed overnight. Horses are racing today on more medication than any time in the past and are having shorter careers, higher vet bills and more dissatisfied owners.

Illegal drugs are not the problem--it’s the so called legal therapeutic medications that are over used and abused. Our allowable levels of therapeutic medications on race day make it extremely difficult to determine the health and soundness of the animal when a pre-race exam is conducted. Inflamed joints, muscles and mild lameness are masked by medication and therefore undetectable to the examining veterinarian. These problems may be minor until the horse leaves the starting gate but become major by the time they reach the turn for home and down the stretch, putting both horse and rider at risk.

We keep many horses racing under the influence of medication that should be retired prior to their career- ending injuries. How can the breeder judge the potential of a sire or dam when performance was influenced with medication?

How does track surface research factor in medication? Having raced with so called therapeutic medication for some thirty years, I now believe we have developed a culture and a breed that is medication dependent.

Reply To This

Steve Wolfson, Sr. - 11/16/2010 3:35:52 PM EST

Suffice it to say: Derby was 13th lifetime start for Secretariat; 15th, Spectacular Bid; 14th, Affirmed; 14th, Northern Dancer in '64; even Native Dancer, 12th in '50. Only Seattle Slew, 7th, defies theory.

Reply To This

Daniel Perlsweig - 11/16/2010 2:40:37 PM EST

I agree horses used to run more times when I started training in 1954. --Dandy Dan.

Reply To This

Bradley A. Rutz - 11/16/2010 1:56:27 PM EST

Breeders need to go back to the philosophy of breeding for racetrack performance and bring to an end the philosophy of breeding for the market. In reality, breeders who breed for the market are the ones to blame for the unsoundness in today’s breed.

Reply To This

Delmar Pettigrew - 11/16/2010 1:30:54 PM EST

Unusual Suspect has 56 starts. He just won Grade 1 at Hollywood. Take a look at his 5 generation pedigree, and you will find no inbreeding. Is there a message here?

Reply To This

Richard Santulli - 11/16/2010 12:16:48 PM EST

Well done article, Bill. No answers, but plenty of questions. A fascinating subject. I was very impressed with your 6:59 mile! I think next time you try to analyze the effects of Lasix, you should consult a vet to see what else you should take.

Reply To This


Post A Comment

If you would like to reply to someone else's comment or add your own, you may do so here. Comments will be screened for appropriate content and will be signed with your full name. No anonymous comments will be posted.

You must be logged in to submit comments to the TDN Magazine. Click here to enter your user ID and password. Login Required

Need help? Take a look at the Frequently Asked Questions area by clicking here.

Learn More - TDN Home - Contact Us - F.A.Q. (Help!) - User Agreement
© 2013 - Thoroughbred Daily News - (732) 747-8060