Thoroughbred Daily News
Thoroughbred Daily News Forum

Click here to download Today's Edition  [3.89Mb - PDF]
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Click HERE to view today's edition in your browser [3.89Mb - PDF]
Click HERE to save today's edition to your computer  [3.89Mb - PDF]
Yesterday's Edition
TDN Archive
TDN Home Page


Week in Photos
The TDN Collection
The TDN Blog
TDN Forum

TDN Sire Stats
TDN Sire Lists
APEX
TDN Progeny
   PP Counts
TDN Progeny PPs
TDN Sales PPs
TDN Insta-Tistics
TDN Stakes Winning
   Pedigrees
TCI on TDN
TDN Black Type
   Library
TDN Rising Stars
TDN op/ed
TDN Q&A
'The Last Word'
PEB's TDN Sketch
   of the Week
TDN Industry
   Calendar
Update PreferencesLogin Required
Columnists Archive
Bill Oppenheim
Sales Ticker
APEX Up Close
Andrew Caulfield
TDN Photo Gallery
TDN Youtube
   Channel
TDN Best Bets
TDN Magazine
TDN Foaling News
Links to Other Sites
Advertisers
Racetracks
TDN Race Criteria
Stakes Digest Weekly
F.A.Q. (Help!)
About the TDN
Contact Us
Advertising Info
Careers

You must be logged in view race videos and to submit comments to the TDN Forum. Click here to enter your user ID and password.

For the best site experience, the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader is suggested. Click here to get it free.

TDN Forums

Welcome to the new TDN Forum, where our readers are invited to share their thoughts about anything they read in the TDN, or about the state of the industry in general. Comments will be screened for appropriate content and will be signed with your full name. No anonymous comments will be posted. We look forward to hearing from you.

Comments are shown in reverse-chronological order, so in order to understand some replies you may need to scroll down the page and work your way up.

TDN Forum Home ➤ Diuretically Speaking

Reply To This Discussion | Start New Discussion

1 ▶▶
Comments 1 to 10 of 14

Discussion: Diuretically Speaking

Re: Diuretically Speaking
by Michael Martin - 06/28/2012 1:08:55 AM EDT

Replying to binky mcfadden:
Conventional wisdom accepts that because overseas horses race without lasix, they are superior. It is one argument for banning race day lasix here. Could we be ignoring the REAL reasons that horses overseas (including U.S bred) can race without lasix?

1. There is less emphasis overseas on pushing immature horses to run as fast and hard as they can, over short distances. The process until they retire.

2. There are significantly fewer sprints which do not allow a horse to truly warm up or settle, and which push them to the limit almost the entire way.

3. There are more route races which require different training regimens.

4. Where track and farm locations permit, horses are vanned or walked to the track. Most are kept on the farms between races with turn out, gallops up and down hills, hacking through woods or countryside. They receive more time off

5. There is less drug use in general. Vets don't pump horses full of other needless, harmful meds and convince trainers that it will give them an edge.

6. There is less need for lasix to overcome the effects of the short-sighted (pun intended) training techniques and racing conditions found here.

7. There are fewer races. There is little or no year round racing. Shorter meets.

8. Grass

Conventional Wisdom: Lasix is required to run in hot, humid climates in the U.S. European weather is different.

1. Hong Kong and Singapore.

2. U.S. horses running and winning in UAE without lasix.

Conventional Wisdom: Lasix results in genetic modifications that pass on bleeding and reduces foreign demand for our yearlings.

1. Lasix does not hurt our yearling market and evidence is incomplete on the genetic consequences. Foreign buyers continue to cherry-pick our yearlings, and limit most of their business to the upper-end of the market. They buy our best, regardless of "American bleeders".

2. When they go overseas much of our bloody bloodstock race without lasix (What?) Lasix and unsubstantiated genetic modification are given too much blame.

3. Foreign jurisdictions except Hong Kong and Germany permit lasix for training only. It is used much less frequently, but some horses get it.

4. How much is too much and how much has no long term effects? The French, British, Australians, et al; nor the Americans have the answer. (Is anyone else old enough to remember the ban on “cancer causing” saccharin? It apparently can cause cancer if you ingest several buckets full daily.)

Lasix is used to save the horses in the U.S. from widespread bad training and racing practices. Trainers, who would otherwise do without it, use it to avoid a disadvantage. Address the bad practices, eliminate the need.

Conventional wisdom; Going along with the crowd. Accepting what is commonplace, thought lacking in originality

Great points. By analogy, let me illustrate the basic cause of bad training which characterizes the basis for all arguments in favor of lasix. Have you ever blown up a balloon? Blow it up too fast, and it pops. Inflate an identical balloon slowly and it will be much larger, so thin that you can see through it.

Alveoi which suddenly are inflated burst in the same manner. Inflate them regularly, and slowy, and the alveoli develop greater air capacity. This inflation,repeated over time, allows greater lung capacity, and resilience, in the lungs; this,in the same manner as in balloons. Giving the horse time to recover from this inflation prevents over-working. Check out the training regimen for previous champions in the past, and you will see rigorous workouts designed to inflate the deepest reaches of the lungs, without bleeding to any great extent. Work them five furlongs, then run them a mile, and most will bleed. Drugs are unnecessary, and a substitute for proper training. Drugs are a cruel excuse for knowledge.

Reply To This

Re: Diuretically Speaking
by henrietta bedford - 06/17/2012 2:20:10 PM EDT

All that the USA is doing is spoiling its own TB racing an d breeding. Today Australia is taking over the mantle of leading racing jurisdiction in the world. Their horses are strong, healthy and very good. Not only are they drug free they also do not get vaccinated for everything, they are "natural" heathy horses. Their added strength is the number of really good NZ horses that race there and win there as well. Keep going America with all you drugs and thus result in removing yourself from being a part of mainstream racing and breeding

Henrietta Bedford

Replying to binky mcfadden:
Conventional wisdom accepts that because overseas horses race without lasix, they are superior. It is one argument for banning race day lasix here. Could we be ignoring the REAL reasons that horses overseas (including U.S bred) can race without lasix?1. There is less emphasis overseas on pushing immature horses to run as fast and hard as they can, over short distances. The process until they retire.2. There are significantly fewer sprints which do not allow a horse to truly warm up or settle, and which push them to the limit almost the entire way. 3. There are more route races which require different training regimens.4. Where track and farm locations permit, horses are vanned or walked to the track. Most are kept on the farms between races with turn out, gallops up and down hills, hacking through woods or countryside. They receive more time off5. There is less drug use in general. Vets don't pump horses full of other needless, harmful meds and convince trainers that it will give them an edge.6. There is less need for lasix to overcome the effects of the short-sighted (pun intended) training techniques and racing conditions found here.7. There are fewer races. There is little or no year round racing. Shorter meets.8. GrassConventional Wisdom: Lasix is required to run in hot, humid climates in the U.S. European weather is different.1. Hong Kong and Singapore.2. U.S. horses running and winning in UAE without lasix.Conventional Wisdom: Lasix results in genetic modifications that pass on bleeding and reduces foreign demand for our yearlings.1. Lasix does not hurt our yearling market and evidence is incomplete on the genetic consequences. Foreign buyers continue to cherry-pick our yearlings, and limit most of their business to the upper-end of the market. They buy our best, regardless of "American bleeders". 2. When they go overseas much of our bloody bloodstock race without lasix (What?) Lasix and unsubstantiated genetic modification are given too much blame.3. Foreign jurisdictions except Hong Kong and Germany permit lasix for training only. It is used much less frequently, but some horses get it.4. How much is too much and how much has no long term effects? The French, British, Australians, et al; nor the Americans have the answer. (Is anyone else old enough to remember the ban on “cancer causing” saccharin? It apparently can cause cancer if you ingest several buckets full daily.) Lasix is used to save the horses in the U.S. from widespread bad training and racing practices. Trainers, who would otherwise do without it, use it to avoid a disadvantage. Address the bad practices, eliminate the need. Conventional wisdom; Going along with the crowd. Accepting what is commonplace, thought lacking in originality

Reply To This

1 ▶▶
Comments 1 to 10 of 14





Post A Comment

Comments will be screened for appropriate content and will be signed with your full name. No anonymous comments will be posted.

You must be logged in to submit comments to the TDN Forum. Click here to enter your user ID and password. Login Required

Need help? Take a look at the Frequently Asked Questions area by clicking here.

Learn More - TDN Home - Contact Us - F.A.Q. (Help!) - User Agreement
© 2013 - Thoroughbred Daily News - (732) 747-8060