TDN Forums

Welcome to the new TDN Forum, where our readers are invited to share their thoughts about anything they read in the TDN, or about the state of the industry in general. Comments will be screened for appropriate content and will be signed with your full name. No anonymous comments will be posted. We look forward to hearing from you.

Comments are shown in reverse-chronological order, so in order to understand some replies you may need to scroll down the page and work your way up.

TDN Forum Home ➤ quality

Reply To This Discussion | Start New Discussion

Comments 1 to 3 of 3

Discussion: quality

Re: Its You
by Travis Wakefield - 12/31/2012 1:26:41 AM EST

Replying to binky mcfadden:
Travis:1:40 would beat or come close to the 1 1/16 record for many major North American tracks. It is not now and never has been a common time on dirt at that distance.

thank you. just remembered how i handicapped 2007 kentucky derby probably. hit the exacta that day with hard spun/ street sense

Reply To This

Its You
by binky mcfadden - 12/27/2012 12:55:06 PM EST

Travis:

1:40 would beat or come close to the 1 1/16 record for many major North American tracks. It is not now and never has been a common time on dirt at that distance.

Reply To This

quality
by Travis Wakefield - 12/24/2012 10:35:40 PM EST

I have a question. When I look at winning times, they are a lot slower than before. For example, I used to look at a 1 1/16 mile, and I would figure a good time would be about 1:40/1:41 and change on the dirt. Try and find that now. I look now and the best I can get is 1:43. Is it me???

Reply To This

Post A Comment